In a matter of pure coincidence as Sun City Anthem is about to welcome the reopening of the restaurant in Anthem Center, the parties involved in the litigation filed by the previous Trumpets operator –S&D Café V, LLC- against the Sun City Anthem Community Association have reached a settlement.
The SCA Board of Directors issued the following statement today (Sept. 2):
The Board of Directors is pleased to announce that the lawsuit between S & D Café, Sun City Anthem and Del Webb was settled on Monday, August 31, 2009. The parties, through their respective legal counsel, put the terms of the settlement on the record before the Court on September 1, 2009.
The terms are as follows:
--Plaintiff S & D Café V, LLC releases and discharges Sun City Anthem Community Association Inc. from all claims arising out of its lawsuit, in exchange for Sun City Anthem's release of S & D from all claims arising under Sun City Anthem's counterclaim. Del Webb is released from the third-party claim. There will be mutual releases executed among all parties.
--S & D Café is to receive a payment of $250,000. Sun City Anthem will not contribute to this payment. The payment is to be made by Del Webb and the insurance carriers for Sun City Anthem.
In reaching settlement, the Board took into consideration the following factors:
--It was the opinion of an impartial professional mediator in the case that the court would be likely to find merit in some of the plaintiff’s claims, thus creating a potential substantial risk to Sun City Anthem.
--The settlement removes any risk to Sun City Anthem and its residents of an adverse judgment and ends this litigation now before further litigation costs are incurred.
--The settlement removes any risk that Sun City Anthem's insurance policies would not have covered all or a portion of the judgment because of the stated exceptions to coverage under the policies. If there had been coverage issues, there may have been more litigation over coverage. Without coverage, there was a risk that any judgment would have had to be paid out of resident assessments. While this was only a possibility, there was still a risk.
--The settlement removes any risk to Sun City that in the event plaintiff obtained a judgment against the Association based on acts of Del Webb, Del Webb would appeal, leaving Sun City Anthem to pay any judgment while an appeal dragged out.
--Sun City Anthem's counterclaim against S & D Café is most likely worthless, as it would be very difficult if not impossible to collect. S & D is a shell company with no known assets. Because the original Lease entered into in 2002 contained no personal guarantees in the event of a default, Sun City Anthem would have to expend more money in legal fees to initiate further action to seek collection of a judgment against S & D Café by "piercing the corporate veil" to go after S & D's principals. This would involve further litigation, additional significant attorney fees without the benefit of our insurance company participation, and very dubious prospects for success.
--Sun City Anthem will not have to pay any part of the settlement amount. That amount was negotiated between the insurance carriers and Del Webb, who all sought to minimize their own risk.
It is important to note that the original lawsuit was filed by S&D Café, not by Sun City Anthem. The amount claimed by S&D Café greatly exceeded the amount of our counterclaim. Regardless of whether the matters in contention were attributed to Del Webb or to the Association, in view of the points stated above the settlement is in the best interest of Sun City Anthem and its homeowners.
Recent Comments