After writing 44 published columns for the Henderson Home News and other weekly newspapers of the Greenspun Media Group, I have tendered my resignation as a columnist. The reason boils down to creative differences over some of the subjects I have chosen to write about. The following column, which was to be published this week or next, suggests reasons why Hillary Clinton may choose New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson as her running mate if she is nominated as the Democratic presidential candidate. My editor, however, suggeested that it reads as if I were endorsing a Clinton- Richardson ticket, whereas my response was that it was an analysis of an emerging potential political reality. In the end, of course, the publisher's management makes the final call, which they did. So I have decided to move on. I greatly enjoyed my time as a Greenspun columnist, and certainly appreciated the generally warm responses my columns received from within and outside of our SCA community.
---------------
Your challenge for today is to guess what the following men have in common: Frank Knox, John Bricker, William Miller, Thomas Marshall, Joseph Robinson and John Sparkman.
All of them were on Republican or Democratic tickets as candidates for vice president of the U.S. during the 20th century. And the fact that most of them are long forgotten points to an important political reality: It is not necessarily the celebrity or accomplishments of the VP candidate that qualify him, or her in the case of Geraldine Ferraro, for this high office. Rather, what usually gets them onto the ticket is the expectation that they will complement their running mates by virtue of geographic diversity and their ability to deliver a dedicated support group of voters who might not be enamored of the top person on the ticket.
Can a person campaigning for president actually be positioning himself for vice president at the same time? Well, you’d never get a presidential candidate to admit it, because the choice of a running mate will always rest with the presidential nominee. But Internet bloggers and some newspaper columnists are speculating that this is exactly what one candidate, New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson, may be aiming for.
Richardson has built one of his most active campaign organizations in Nevada and has publicly indicated that he views our state as his best chance to increase his national visibility with favorable results in January’s Nevada Democratic caucuses. This could put him in line to become Hillary Clinton’s running mate if Sen. Clinton captures her party’s nomination.
If Clinton wins the nomination, here are some reasons why I am willing to go out on a limb and predict that she will choose Gov. Richardson as her running mate.
The first reason is geographic diversity. Clinton represents New York State and will be strong in the northeast, as well as other regions. Richardson is a popular governor of a state in the increasingly influential southwest, where it is thought that states such as Arizona, New Mexico and Nevada could tip the vote in the Democrats’ favor next year.
The next reason is ethnicity. Richardson is half Hispanic, the son of a Caucasian American father and a Mexican mother. Though born in California, he grew up in Mexico City and has always had special appeal for Hispanic Americans and as an advocate for Native Americans. My expectation is that if Richardson is on the ticket, his popularity will spill over to other racial and ethnic groups who see themselves as moving rapidly into the mainstream of American political life.
Our increasing American diversity can no longer be ignored. Statistics released last week by the U.S. Census Bureau reveal that non-whites now make up a majority in nearly one-third of the nation’s most populous counties, and nearly one in every 10 of the nation’s 3,141 counties has a population that is more than 50 percent minority. I wrote several months ago of a major campaign being mounted by a Spanish-language television network to register Hispanic voters, and this demographic would likely gravitate toward a presidential ticket including Gov. Richardson.
Another reason why a nominated candidate Clinton is likely to partner with Richardson is his closeness to the Clinton family. Not just a faceless bureaucrat, Richardson served as Pres. Clinton’s Ambassador to the United Nations, leaving that post when he was named Secretary of the Department of Energy. And he served as an international troubleshooter, negotiating hostage releases with Iraq, North Korea and the Sudan. Due in part to these activities, he has been nominated four times for the Nobel Peace Prize.
To say that Richardson has been a popular governor would be an understatement; when reelected New Mexico governor, he captured nearly 70 percent of the vote, including 40 percent of Republicans.
The bottom line is that Richardson’s credentials are unusually impressive for a potential vice-presidential candidate, placing him several cuts above the type of person typically selected by a presidential nominee.
I am not advocating the nomination of any particular candidate for president. What I am stating, however, is that if current front-runner Hillary Clinton is the Democratic nominee, I believe she will select Bill Richardson as her running mate.
The advice of those who have Sen. Clinton’s ear may have a lot to do with this outcome. Consider, for instance, the recent words of Nevada University System Chancellor Jim Rogers, who is Nevada Co-Chairman of the Clinton campaign: “I would love to see Hillary as the candidate for president and Bill Richardson as vice president,” Rogers said. “For me, that would be close to perfect.”

Recent Comments