This is an Anthem Journal editorial.
Dear Readers: This is a difficult editorial for me to write, because it seeks to make comparisons that some may strongly disagree with, or at least may believe are not valid. But in considering whether to write this piece, I have consulted with many residents over the past week or so, and I am encouraged by the level of agreement and support I have encountered.
---------------
The discussion starts with the despicable, universally condemned attack on Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and the murder of numerous people who were gathered to see her.
While the temptation is to fix causation on the right wing, citing as partial evidence the tone created by gun sight cross-hairs overlaid on a map that included Giffords’s district, there appears to be no evidence that the accused killer was influenced by such images and their accompanying rhetoric.
What the Tucson incident has led to, however, is a national discussion over the decline in civility that exists, such as it is, in our political discourse.
“It is fair to say, in today’s political climate, and given today’s political rhetoric, that many have contributed to the building levels of vitriol in our political discourse that have surely contributed to the atmosphere in which this event transpired,” said a statement issued by the National Jewish Democratic Council.
“We’re on Sarah Palin’s targeted list,” Giffords said last March. “But the thing is that she has it depicted as the cross hairs of a gun sight over our district. When people do that, they’ve got to realize there’s consequences to that.”
This is not to assign blame for such things to the right. The left has been guilty of extreme language, too.
“The point isn’t to quash free speech,” said the Chicago Tribune. “It’s to ceaselessly attempt to balance robustness with civility, passion with restraint. That mission, by the way, falls to every one of us – not just to those other people, over there, blinded by their foolish ideology to what’s obviously true.”
Said Pima County (AZ) Sheriff Clarence Dupnik: “It’s not unusual for all public officials to get threats constantly, myself included. That’s the sad thing about what’s going on in America; pretty soon we’re not going to be able to find reasonable, decent people willing to subject themselves to serve in public office.”
This brings us to Sun City Anthem, where the level of vitriol toward our elected leaders and Association volunteers has many saying, “I worked hard all my life. Why should I subject myself to such vilification, such name calling, such unfounded and unfair accusations?”
The result, of course, is a constant challenge in finding community-minded volunteers.
In recent months and weeks, we have seen community leaders called crooks and criminals. We have seen our committee members disparaged as being incapable of independent thinking. We have seen Board decisions compared to the murder of millions by the Nazis in The Holocaust, or accused of practicing McCarthyism. We have seen our volunteers labeled as pigs and described as living in a pig sty. We have seen others called “psychotic” and “brainless.” And worse.
No intellectual discussions of approaches to governance or the legitimate pros and cons of official decisions. Just a constant stream of personal attacks.
I have no quarrel with those who have disagreements over policy and decisions, but injecting personal attacks into it is what brings the level of discourse down into the gutter.
Most of those who move into a homeowners association such as ours understand that they are joining a community which is governed by RULES set in place for the common good. They have the option to either join together in observance of these rules, which include our CC&Rs and related documents, along with a substantial Nevada statute, or they can choose to live outside of an HOA where rules are not needed.
Even within the HOA, if we don’t like some of the rules we can elect new Board members and set about changing them.
One of the Board’s harshest critics, writing on another blog, simply doesn’t understand HOA structure.
“I’m an adult, an old adult getting older each and every day,” he writes, “that somehow in hell made it to the age that I currently am, living by my own rules…”
“I don’t ask anyone to live by my rules, and don’t expect anyone to tell me how to live by theirs.”
“What does a homeowners association provide you other than the lunacy of a bunch of nutcases that need to make rules?”
“The hell with a Board of Directors. Other than making sure the bills get paid and the service work is done properly, leave us alone.”
“Allow me to secede from this ridiculous form of rules and I will agree to privately pay for any services that I personally desire. My property taxes already pay for my streets, I’ll pay the $10.00 to use the pool as well as any other user fees, but I am willing to forgo all the other ‘benefits’ I seem to be charged for, but never use, in order to support the rules of most others that spend my money like it was derived from rubbing Aladdin’s Lamp over and over again.”
This is clearly a man who needs to be living in a neighborhood which is not part of an HOA, because in his world everyone living here would make their own decisions on what to pay for and what not to. Sorry, but that reflects a base, fundamental failure to understand what an HOA is.
As you know, I began this editorial with references to the tragedy in Tucson. Lest you think it is a stretch to bring that sad event into a discussion of life in an HOA, former Sun City Anthem Community Manager Arnie Snow might disagree with you.
On April 19, 2000, ironically the fifth anniversary of the Oklahoma City bombing, Arnie Snow was manager of an Arizona HOA called Ventana Lakes. On that date, and in Arnie Snow’s presence, a disgruntled former homeowner burst into a meeting of the directors and, brandishing several weapons, shot two directors to death and wounded several others.
The killer, Richard Glassel, received the death penalty and still sits on Arizona’s death row after several appeals. At worst, he’ll be behind bars for the rest of his life, because he was also sentenced to 351 years for the shooting of those who survived.
Homeowner anger can boil over and happen anywhere, and failure to engage in civil discourse is not a good recipe for getting along.
Recent Comments